Board Logo
« No More Planet Pluto »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jan 17th, 2018, 6:04pm



In the News Forum
Important Info


Clicking on the scroll bar is a quick and easy way to navigate through a thread

Visit our Frequently asked Questions board to learn more tips





This Board is used for discussion of current events. Feel free to post items of interest or opinions about the world around us.

As a reminder, political discussions are not accepted under our current guidelines.



"Newspapers are the world's mirrors. -- James Ellis
Need Help?

Frequently Asked Questions

Global Moderators and Administrators

Kathi (Painter)
Lendi
Fancy
Notonline (Danny)

« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
 thread  Author  Topic: No More Planet Pluto  (Read 943 times)
Michelle
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 2569
xx No More Planet Pluto
« Thread started on: Aug 24th, 2006, 4:07pm »


PRAGUE, Czech Republic (AP) - Pluto, beloved by some as a cosmic underdog but scorned by astronomers who considered it too dinky and distant, was unceremoniously stripped of its status as a planet Thursday.

The International Astronomical Union, dramatically reversing course just a week after floating the idea of reaffirming Pluto's planethood and adding three new planets to Earth's neighborhood, downgraded the ninth rock from the sun in historic new galactic guidelines.

Powerful new telescopes, experts said, are changing the way they size up the mysteries of the solar system and beyond. But the scientists showed a soft side, waving plush toys of the Walt Disney character - and insisting that Pluto's spirit will live on in the exciting discoveries yet to come.

"The word 'planet' and the idea of planets can be emotional because they're something we learn as children," said Richard Binzel, a professor of planetary science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who helped hammer out the new definition.


"This is really all about science, which is all about getting new facts," he said. "Science has marched on. ... Many more Plutos wait to be discovered."

Pluto, a planet since 1930, got the boot because it didn't meet the new rules, which say a planet not only must orbit the sun and be large enough to assume a nearly round shape, but must "clear the neighborhood around its orbit." That disqualifies Pluto, whose oblong orbit overlaps Neptune's, downsizing the solar system to eight planets from the traditional nine.

Astronomers have labored without a universal definition of a planet since well before the time of Copernicus, who proved that the Earth revolves around the sun, and the experts gathered in Prague burst into applause when the guidelines were passed.

Predictably, Pluto's demotion provoked plenty of wistful nostalgia.

"It's disappointing in a way, and confusing," said Patricia Tombaugh, the 93-year-old widow of Pluto discoverer Clyde Tombaugh.

"I don't know just how you handle it. It kind of sounds like I just lost my job," she said from Las Cruces, N.M. "But I understand science is not something that just sits there. It goes on. Clyde finally said before he died, 'It's there. Whatever it is. It is there.'"

The decision by the IAU, the official arbiter of heavenly objects, restricts membership in the elite cosmic club to the eight classical planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

Pluto and objects like it will be known as "dwarf planets," which raised some thorny questions about semantics: If a raincoat is still a coat, and a cell phone is still a phone, why isn't a dwarf planet still a planet?

NASA said Pluto's downgrade would not affect its $700 million New Horizons spacecraft mission, which this year began a 9 1/2-year journey to the oddball object to unearth more of its secrets.

But mission head Alan Stern said he was "embarrassed" by Pluto's undoing and predicted that Thursday's vote would not end the debate. Although 2,500 astronomers from 75 nations attended the conference, only about 300 showed up to vote.

"It's a sloppy definition. It's bad science," he said. "It ain't over."

The shift also poses a challenge to the world's teachers, who will have to scramble to alter lesson plans just as schools open for the fall term.

"We will adapt our teaching to explain the new categories," said Neil Crumpton, who teaches science at a high school north of London. "It will all take some explanation, but it is really just a reclassification and I can't see that it will cause any problems. Science is an evolving subject and always will be."

Under the new rules, two of the three objects that came tantalizingly close to planethood will join Pluto as dwarfs: the asteroid Ceres, which was a planet in the 1800s before it got demoted, and 2003 UB313, an icy object slightly larger than Pluto whose discoverer, Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology, has nicknamed "Xena." The third object, Pluto's largest moon, Charon, isn't in line for any special designation.

Brown, whose Xena find rekindled calls for Pluto's demise because it showed it isn't nearly as unique as it once seemed, waxed philosophical.

"Eight is enough," he said, jokingly adding: "I may go down in history as the guy who killed Pluto."

Demoting the icy orb named for the Roman god of the underworld isn't personal - it's just business - said Jack Horkheimer, director of the Miami Space Transit Planetarium and host of the PBS show "Star Gazer."

"It's like an amicable divorce," he said. "The legal status has changed but the person really hasn't. It's just single again."

Article
User IP Logged

Notonline
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

"And in the end it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years." ~A.L.~


PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 2992
xx Re: No More Planet Pluto
« Reply #1 on: Aug 24th, 2006, 10:35pm »

User Image
« Last Edit: Aug 24th, 2006, 10:36pm by Notonline » User IP Logged



Norman
Full Member
ImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Male
Posts: 148
xx Re: No More Planet Pluto
« Reply #2 on: Aug 26th, 2006, 02:49am »

Certain people were determined to downgrade Pluto (I know not why), but they had to find a system that would downgrade Pluto without also downgrading Earth.

Why are they concerned that there might be large numbers of planets? There are very large numbers of stars and that has not caused any problems. Perhaps a way could be found to downgrade some stars so that we only have eight stars and lots of dwarf stars.

Norman
User IP Logged

Lendi
Global Moderator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar




PM

Gender: Female
Posts: 8915
xx Re: No More Planet Pluto
« Reply #3 on: Aug 26th, 2006, 11:06am »

I would have liked it to stay! And, I hope someone, somehow get them to reverse their decision. But, I'm not holding my breath.
User IP Logged

What if trials of this life
Are Your mercies in disguise?
"Blessings; Laura Short"
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »



Disclaimer: This site is not operated nor endorsed by any medical professionals. All posts are the opinions
and comments of the participants. We are not responsible for any medical or non-professional opinions.

This site is for support and provides a forum for sharing coping tips and skills. No one should rely upon any opinion
or comment contained herein for the purposes of medical treatment or attention. You are urged to consult with your
physician prior to engaging in any sort of medical treatment that may be suggested through this site.

No representation or warranties are made for the content of the opinions or comments and should not be considered as medical advice.

Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls